🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered favorable results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."